Capacity Choice, Monetary Trade, and the Cost of Inflation (Slides) with Stanislav Rabinovich. Forthcoming, European Economic Review.
Firms often make production decisions before meeting a buyer. We incorporate this often-overlooked fact into an otherwise standard monetary search model and show that it has important implications for the set of equilibria, efficiency, and the cost of inflation. Our model features a strategic complementarity between the buyers' ex ante choice of money balances and sellers' ex ante choice of productive capacity. When resale value of unsold inventories is high, sellers carry excess capacity and the equilibrium is unique. But, when resale value is low, there is a continuum of equilibria, all of which are inefficient and welfare-ranked. Effects of inflation are highly nonlinear. When inflation is high, the buyer's money holdings bind, and inflation therefore reduces trade through a standard real-balance channel. When inflation is low, the seller's capacity constraint binds, real balances have no effect at the margin, and inflation has no effect on output or welfare.
Self-Confirming Price Dispersion in Monetary Economies with Stanislav Rabinovich. Journal of Economic Theory, 2019, vol 183, pp 284-311. (published version, slides)
In a monetary economy, we show that price dispersion arises as an equilibrium outcome without the need for costly simultaneous search or any heterogeneity in preferences, production costs, or search technologies. A distribution of money holdings among buyers makes sellers indifferent across a set of posted prices, leading to a non-degenerate price distribution. This price distribution, in turn, makes buyers indifferent across a range of money balances, rationalizing the non-degenerate distribution of money holdings. We completely characterize the distribution of posted prices and money holdings in any equilibrium. Equilibria with price dispersion admit higher maximum prices than observed in any single-price equilibrium. Also, price dispersion reduces welfare by creating mismatch between posted prices and money balances. Inflation exacerbates this welfare loss by shifting the distribution towards higher prices.
This paper updates the standard workhorse model of banks’ reserve management to include frictions inherent to money markets. We apply the model to study monetary policy implementation through an operating regime involving voluntary reserve targets (VRT). When reserves are abundant, as is the case following the unconventional policies adopted during the recent financial crisis, operating regimes based on reserve requirements may lead to a collapse in interbank trade. We show that, no matter the relative abundance of reserves, VRT encourage market activity and support the central bank’s control over interest rates. In addition to this characterization, we consider (i) the impact of anticipated and non-unanticipated liquidity injections by the central bank on market outcomes and (ii) a comparison with the implementation framework currently adopted by the Federal Reserve. Overall, we show that a VRT framework may provide several advantages over other frameworks.
We develop a model where persistent trade shocks create demand for a basket-backed stablecoin, such as Mark Carney’s “synthetic hegemonic currency” or Facebook’s recent proposal for Libra. In numerical simulations, we find four main results. First, because of general equilibrium effects of the basket currency, overall demand for that currency is small. Second, despite scant holdings of the basket, its global reach contributes to substantial increases in welfare. Third, we calculate the welfare maximizing composition of the basket, finding that optimal weights depend on the pattern of international acceptance, but that basket composition does not significantly affect welfare. Fourth, despite potential welfare improvements, low demand for the basket currency from buyers limits sellers’ incentives to invest in accepting it, suggesting that fears of a threat to dollar dominance by so-called global stablecoins may be misplaced.
A Simple Model of Voluntary Reserve Targets with Tolerance Bands with Francesca Carapella. (R&R Journal of Money Credit and Banking)
This note presents a simplified version of the model of voluntary reserve targets (VRT) developed in Baughman and Carapella (2019), with a Walrasian interbank market. First, the model makes transparent the role of target setting in controlling the market rate. Second, the simplicity of the model allows for an analysis of the interaction between VRT and tolerance bands, which are a common tool for controlling rate variability. We find that the persistent overshooting of interbank rates observed duringCapacity Choice and the Cost of Inflation with Stanislav Rabinovich the Bank of England's experiment with VRT may derive from the interaction between target setting and tolerance bands, a new explanation relative to the literature. We also suggest a simple remedy.
Deadlines and fixed end dates are pervasive in matching markets including school choice, the market for new graduates, and even financial markets such as the market for federal funds. Deadlines drive fundamental non-stationarity and complexity in behavior, generating significant departures from the steady-state equilibria usually studied in the search and matching literature. I consider a two-sided matching market with search frictions where vertically differentiated agents attempt to form bilateral matches before a deadline. I give conditions for existence and uniqueness of equilibria, and show that all equilibria exhibit an "anticipation effect" where less attractive agents become increasingly choosy over time, preferring to wait for the opportunity to match with attractive agents who, in turn, become less selective as the deadline approaches. When payoffs accrue after the deadline, or agents do not discount, a sharp characterization is available: at any point in time, the market is segmented into a first class of matching agents and a second class of waiting agents. This points to a different interpretation of unraveling observed in some markets and provides a benchmark for other studies of non-stationary matching. A simple intervention -- a small participation cost -- can dramatically improve efficiency.
Almost all retailers offer multiple products, and consumers search for low prices on a basket of goods. Kaplan and Menzio (2014) document a great deal of price dispersion both within and across stores offering multiple products. This paper extends Burdett and Judd (1983), a canonical model of equilibrium price dispersion, to the case of multiple products. As shown in Burdett and Malueg (1981), when sequentially searching for multiple products, consumers (a) face a lower cost of search per good and (b) may capitalize on low prices for one good while continuing to search for an acceptable price on the others. This leads multi-product consumers to set one reservation price for a basket of goods, and a higher (per good) reservation price for each good alone. This paper characterizes firms' pricing decisions in light of this search behavior. In a simple version of the model where all firms offer every good, the marginal distribution of each price is unique and of the same form as would obtain in a simple single product model, and any joint distribution with support contained in the acceptance set of consumers satisfies equilibrium. This provides theoretical foundation for the common empirical focus on marginal price distributions -- as only these are determined in equilibrium. While the structure of equilibrium is unaffected by the addition of single good demanders, the addition of single good firms can lead to one of several pricing patterns depending on parameters. A consistent prediction is that, if enough firms can offer only a single good, these single product firms crowd out the bottom of the price distribution, with the interesting equilibrium effect of also lowering the highest prices charged by multi-product firms -- an effect which would not obtain in the single product case.
Trade volumes in the federal funds market have remained low since the recent financial crisis. While some argue that this derives from a flood of money in the system, we propose an alternate explanation based on the distinguishing characteristic of the fed funds market: unlike other markets, whose volumes have recovered, fed funds loans are unsecured. In a model of a money market with unsecured loans subject to endogenous borrowing constraints where the central bank pays interest on reserves (IOR), we show that high levels of IOR reduce trade by tightening credit limits. Friedman's dictum that the central bank should pay a market rate fails to deliver efficiency because IOR decreases the opportunity cost of money holdings relative to credit, so decreases both the profits from lending and the value of borrowing. This results in a tightening of the endogenous borrowing constraint. When IOR exceeds the growth rate of money, credit limits plummet to zero, and no borrowing occurs despite an extant need for funds. Alternate rate schedules besides constant IOR, such as the limited deposit regime employed by Norges Bank in response to dissatisfaction with the functioning of their floor system provide additional incentives to trade which relax credit constraints and improve welfare.
Works in Progress
Endogenous Network Formation in Financial Intermediation with Ryan H. Peters
This note provides a general-audience discussion of the results on monetary policy implementation under a voluntary reserve targets framework derived in two academic papers on the subject.
Press Coverage at Central Banking
Faster Payments: Market Structure and Policy Considerations with Aaron Rosenbaum, Mark Manuszak, Kylie Stewart, Fumiko Hayashi, and Joanna Stavins.
A discussion of market structures that may emerge in the nascent market for faster payments.